Council services by letter

Agenda and minutes

||

Venue: Committee Rooms 1 & 2, Harrow Civic Centre, Station Road, Harrow, HA1 2XY. View directions

Contact: Frankie Belloli, Senior Democratic Services Officer  Tel: 020 8424 1263 E-mail:  frankie.belloli@harrow.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

116.

Attendance by Reserve Members

To note the attendance at this meeting of any duly appointed Reserve Members.

 

Reserve Members may attend meetings:-

 

(i)                 to take the place of an ordinary Member for whom they are a reserve;

(ii)               where the ordinary Member will be absent for the whole of the meeting; and

(iii)             the meeting notes at the start of the meeting at the item ‘Reserves’ that the Reserve Member is or will be attending as a reserve;

(iv)              if a Reserve Member whose intention to attend has been noted arrives after the commencement of the meeting, then that Reserve Member can only act as a Member from the start of the next item of business on the agenda after his/her arrival.

Minutes:

RESOLVED:  To note that no Reserve Members had been nominated to attend the meeting.

117.

Declarations of Interest

To receive declarations of disclosable pecuniary or non pecuniary interests, arising from business to be transacted at this meeting, from:

 

(a)               all Members of the Sub-Committee;

(b)               all other Members present.

Minutes:

In connection with Agenda Item 7 (Public Health Annual report 2018), Councillor Mrs Vina Mithani declared a non-pecuniary interest in that she is an employee of the Health Protection Agency.  She would remain in the room whilst the matter was considered and voted upon.

 

In connection with all the substantive agenda items, Julian Maw declared a non-pecuniary interest in that he is Trustee of Age UK Harrow.  He would remain in the room whilst the matter was considered and voted upon.

 

In connection with Agenda Item 9 (Dementia Friendly Housing Review), Councillor Chris Mote declared a non-pecuniary interest in that his father is a resident of a care home in the Borough (not one of the sites which had been visited as part of the review).  In connection with the other agenda items, he declared a non-pecuniary interest in that his daughter works at Northwick Park Hospital.  He would remain in the room whilst the matters were considered and voted upon.

 

In connection with Agenda Item 9 (Dementia Friendly Housing Review), Councillor Kareema Marikar declared a non-pecuniary interest in that she works for Oxfordshire Mental Health Trust.  She would remain in the room whilst the matter was considered and voted upon.

118.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 126 KB

That the minutes of the meeting held on 3 July 2017 be taken as read and signed as a correct record.

Minutes:

RESOLVED:  That the minutes of the meeting held on 3 July  2017, be taken as read and signed as a correct record.

119.

Public Questions and Petitions

To receive any public questions received in accordance with Committee Procedure Rule 17 (Part 4B of the Constitution).

 

Questions will be asked in the order in which they were received.  There will be a time limit of 15 minutes for the asking and answering of public questions.

 

[The deadline for receipt of public questions is 3.00 pm on Friday, 9 March 2018.  Questions should be sent to publicquestions@harrow.gov.uk  

No person may submit more than one question].

Minutes:

RESOLVED:  To note that no public questions or petitions were received at this meeting.

120.

References from Council and Other Committees/Panels

To receive any references from Council and/or other Committees or Panels.

Minutes:

There were none.

RESOLVED ITEMS

121.

Public Health Annual Report 2018 pdf icon PDF 165 KB

Report of the Designate Director of Public Health

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Sub-Committee received a report on public health issues and activities in 2017-18 from the new Director of Public Health, Carole Furlong, who was welcomed and congratulated on her appointment.  She underlined some of the key points arising, including the following:

 

a)            The report sought to use more accessible ways of imparting information, in particular through the use of “infographics”, charts and diagrams.

 

b)            The report included ward health profiles showing the characteristics of each area in terms of geography, essential services and the people who live there.

 

c)            The profiles also mirrored the health and well being strategy themes of Start Well, Live Well, Work Well and Age Well, and they illustrated the  inequalities in health the Borough and some of the issues that contribute to them. 

 

d)            There were some areas of concern identified in the report and these included health problems affecting elderly people and disadvantaged communities. 

 

In discussion of the report, questions from the members of the Sub-Committee and Advisers were answered as follows:

 

i.              What was the direction of travel in terms of health inequality?  There was variation year on year, but the overall health inequality gap appeared not to be closing.  In particular, there was concern on the impact of poverty on health and the difficulties in accessing services. 

 

ii.            Had there been any unusual results in particular areas?  There were a number of interesting variations such as the impact of deprivation as between the north and south of the Borough.  Other differences included those related to housing cost and conditions, and also the levels of alcohol consumption in relatively affluent areas. 

 

iii.           What were the key messages for commissioners of services?  The results provided useful data for commissioners in terms of prioritising and targeting particular areas; it was hoped that this would make it easier to lever in more finding, say, in such areas as mental health and learning disabilities.  The data came from a range of sources, and therefore some was more recent than others; it included some which was modelled from 2011 Census results. 

 

iv.           The position in respect of dental health.  It was important to avoid the sense that this was simply an area for specialists and rather emphasise that all involved in children’s care could play a part.  An information pack had been produced with NHS England, funded from Health Education in England, and the impact would be evaluated by the health education unit at Queen Mary’s Hospital.  Work would be done with new dentists practising in the area so that messages were reinforced. 

 

v.            Would the implications of the prevalence of diabetes be addressed in future given that Harrow had a high proportion of residents suffering from Type 2 Diabetes?  A report would be brought forward on diabetes and this would include data from GPs and would address the communities most at risk of harm from the condition.

 

vi.           Were some of the trends and results related to housing tenure?  The increase in the number of children presenting  ...  view the full minutes text for item 121.

122.

Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment pdf icon PDF 110 KB

Report of the Designate Director of Public Health

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Director of Public Health introduced the report, underlining the joint work with partner agencies and the finding that there was a good level of provision in the Borough.  The Sub-Committee welcomed Mike Leviton, Chief Executive of the Local Pharmaceutical Committee, who gave a presentation on pharmacy services in the area.  He had been impressed by the Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment (PNA)for the Borough which compared well with other areas he covered; this regulatory document was important in facilitating NHS England carrying out its functions.  Mr Levington acknowledged the impact of budget cuts on Council services and confirmed that, ideally, he would wish to see links between the PNA and the Public Health Report.  Traditionally, there had been a good supply of pharmacies in Harrow (and in nearby Brent), but there were certain parts of the Borough where demand was higher.  Mr Levington underlined the value of this clinical service in a “normal” environment and the fact that a pharmacy provided this service on an “open-door” basis over long hours and in convenient locations; a pharmacy could also make a referral to other health services if a condition was deemed serious enough.

 

Mr Levington referred to a pilot project across 30 pharmacies in Harrow, Hillingdon and Brent providing support for infants and early years children; it had links to Imperial College London and to Professor Blair at Northwick Park Hospital.  The project sought to improve the health and care of families in antenatal and postnatal periods and in a child’s early years and it benefited from good support from public health staff in the three borough councils.  Its impact would be evaluated over the next year. 

 

Mr Levington spoke about the challenges presented by the reduction of remuneration to pharmacies and the shortage of certain medicines.  He went on to explain the “Prescribing Wisely” initiative by the North West London CCG which sought to discover more about medicines purchased over the counter at pharmacies and elsewhere, and the prices charged.  There was also interest in addressing the issues of the over-ordering of medicines and patient confidentiality in the arrangements for the delivery of medicines. 

 

Mr Levington concluded by referring to the surprising exclusion of pharmacies from the STP review in North West London, particularly given the level of NHS spend on medicines. 

 

In discussion of the report and presentation, the following principal points were made:

 

a)            In terms of addressing gaps in services, it was anticipated that NHS commissioning would reflect the expected increase in housing developments over the next three years and this would form part of the next PNA.  The current trend was towards combined GP and pharmacy services on the same site.  It was not expected that significant pharmacy service gaps would develop. 

 

b)            There was potential for greater use of pharmacies to take the pressure off A&E and primary care services.  Traditionally, CCGs would not commission services to deal with “minor ailments” and there were issues around the limitations on prescriptions.  A study by Professor Blair  ...  view the full minutes text for item 122.

123.

Update from North West London Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee pdf icon PDF 100 KB

Report of the Divisional Director, Strategic Commissioning

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Chair updated the Sub-Committee on the work of the North West London Joint Overview and Scrutiny Committee (JOSC), focussing on the meeting which had taken place on the previous day.  The JOSC had received Accident and Emergency performance data which revealed that the target of 95% of patients being seen within 4 hours had not been met, but that performance in North West London had been better than the average for the country and for London as a whole.  There was an issue related to the increase number of walk-in centres but this would probably improved the Borough’s overall performance figures.  The JOSC had received an update report from Healthwatch Central West London which was available via the online JOSC documents.

 

The Chair reported on the JOSC’s consideration of the “Home First” initiative supporting timely discharge from hospital through assessment in the home environment.  It had already been designed and tested, with some 1500 patients successfully discharged.  Hillingdon Hospital had found that the average stay in hospital had reduced by 2.2 days as result, and in Medway, there had been a 25% reduction in transfers of care.  The Chair also reported on the Hospital Transfer Red Bag initiative for care home patients as a result of which Sutton had experienced hospital stays lasting 3 to 4 days less on average.  It was planned to extend the scheme to Hillingdon and Hounslow.  It was agreed that Harrow CCG be asked to report to the Sub-Committee on the Home First and Hospital Transfer Red Bag schemes. 

 

Councillor Chris Mote reported on the triage system at the Northwick Park Hospital A&E Department which meant that patients with conditions which were not life-threatening or serious otherwise, would sometimes have to wait for hours for treatment.  

 

RESOLVED:  That the report be noted and that Harrow CCG be asked to report to the Sub-Committee on the Home First and Hospital Transfer Red Bag schemes.

RECOMMENDED ITEMS

124.

Dementia Friendly Housing Review pdf icon PDF 119 KB

Report of the Divisional Director, Strategic Commissioning

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Farah Ikram, Policy Officer, introduced the report explaining the background to the research and the methodology of the review.  A number of site visits had taken place to provide Members with direct experience of dementia-friendly accommodation and services.  It was hoped that the findings would assist in the planning of relevant Council services and housing developments in future. 

 

The Chair thanked all those involved in the review.  He highlighted the visits to Annie’s Place, which had provided powerful contributions form carers, residents and their families, and to Teo Situ House in Southwark where the use of innovative diagrammatic signage and photos assisted residents with dementia. 

 

Councillor Chris Mote referred to the difficulty of finding information on dementia on the Council’s website.  He suggested that the availability to dementia sufferers of a zero rating for Council Tax purposes should be more publicised more widely and that processes should be simplified to assist those with dementia and their families and carers, for example, providing alternatives to online information and transactions.  Dr Merali proposed that a letter be sent to all dementia sufferers and their carers in the Borough about the Council Tax exemption and this was supported by the Sub-Committee. 

 

Councillor Mithani confirmed that relevant recommendations had been made as part of the review such as improvements to the Council’s website. 

 

Councillor Marikar referred to her experience working in the care sector and underlined the importance of families and carers being informed about services and facilities available, including addressing any language barriers. 

 

Councillor Dattani highlighted Recommendation 5 concerning work with   Harrow CCG to ensure better integration of health and adult social care services, improved awareness of and signposting to other services in the Borough, and identify gaps in service provision.  As Portfolio Holder Assistant for Innovation, he would raise relevant issues with the IT Department and Customer Services managers. 

 

Ms Ikram referred to the information from Barnet Council about the integration of adult care services across the local authority, voluntary and health sectors.  She suggested that the Council enter a dialogue with the CCG on these issues and the broader recommendations arising from the review.  

 

Councillor Mithani suggested that the Council’s Housing Department be encouraged to consider Barnet’s approach to dementia-friendly housing.  She had heard radio coverage of dementia-friendly “villages” and communities which appeared to provide excellent models for future developments.  Councillor Chris Mote advised that Adult Services had acquired 10 housing units to develop as transitional accommodation between hospital and home; he considered that, should these prove successful, the provision should be expanded.

 

RESOLVED:  That

 

(1)          the review report and its recommendations be endorsed;

 

(2)          the Sub-Committee revisit the implementation of recommendations in its work programme for 2018/2019; and

 

(3)          the Harrow CCG be invited to attend a future meeting of the Sub-Committee to discuss the report’s implications. 

 

Resolved to RECOMMEND:  (to Cabinet)

 

That the review report and its recommendations be forwarded to Cabinet and to relevant agencies, as identified in the recommendations, for consideration and response.

125.

Any Other Business

Which cannot otherwise be dealt with.

Minutes:

As this was the final meeting of the Sub-Committee in this Council Administration, the Chair wished to thank all Members and Advisers for their excellent contributions to its work.  In particular, he thanked Councillor Mithani for her work as Vice-Chair.  He said it had been his honour and privilege to serve as the Sub-Committee’s Chair in recent years.